The Safety Test Is Allowed Again
Washington reportedly reopened the door to British testing of unreleased AI models. Access is back; a regulatory veto is not part of the evidence.
Read the pick: The Safety Test Is Allowed AgainX OPPORTUNITY RADAR / SHORT TAKE
The Pentagon says it will livestream a scheduled execution. The camera deserves its own scrutiny.

Viddy the latest programming decision, droogies. The Pentagon says it will livestream Nidal Hasan’s scheduled execution. AP reports that officials confirmed the plan on October 8 and promised more details. The audience invitation has arrived ahead of the broadcast arrangements.[2]
The Army’s October 7 statement says President Trump approved Hasan’s death sentence on October 2. Acting Army Secretary Adam Telle then directed a firing-squad execution for December 3, 2026, at 1 p.m. CST at Fort Hood, Texas.[1]
Hasan was convicted of killing 13 people in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting. The public record is grim enough without a state-produced premiere.[2]
One important qualification belongs ahead of the production notes: AP reports that Hasan could still seek habeas relief in civilian federal court, potentially delaying the execution. The announced date remains subject to possible further legal proceedings.[3]
In the interview published by Human Events, Pete Hegseth said public viewing would help people understand that such acts have serious consequences.[4]
Here’s the editorial question: what does the camera add to accountability? Access to records, independent reporting and scrutiny of the procedure let people examine state power. A government livestream gives the institution carrying out the punishment another job: presenting it to an audience.
The victims and survivors owe this production no viewing figures. Officials can answer questions about the law, the process and their decision to broadcast. A red light on a camera supplies none of those answers.
Horrorshow production values. Still waiting on the public-interest case.
Checked Oct 8, 2026. Numbered references point to the evidence behind factual passages. Commentary is our own.